Category Archives: graphic novels

published drawn narratives by other folks

Is Fantagraphics dying?

This is more of a gut-level feeling than a thought-out argument, but I wanted to throw it out there. Let me offer a few things that provoked this question…

  • Some of the best artists of Fantagraphics– Chris Ware and Dan Clowes– have struck their tents and moved them to the Drawn and Quarterly fairgrounds.
  • Fantagraphics has done a lot lately with reprints, but what new artists have they brought into the critical spotlight?
  • The last few times I’ve ordered books from Fantagraphics, they have taken months to get to me.
  • The shakedown (or is it death?) of The Comics Journal. Noah Berlatsky comments on the current incarnation of the magazne’s web presence here.
Posted in comics, graphic novels | 2 Comments

classic shmassics

Derik Badman’s dislike of Barefoot Gen, which is often considered a comics classic, lead me to think of classics that I myself don’t like. While in general I think it’s more useful to argue why something is good, I also think blanket praise is useless. So I want to be the contrarian when I hear it. And maybe I’m just in a crabby mood.

Persepolis. I’m glad people have read this. Anything that helps to humanize Iranians for people in Europe and the U.S. is a good thing. But that’s politics. As art, I just don’t think Persepolis deserves the accolades it has received. There is nothing about the art that stands out. The characterizations are pretty flat. And the plot merely moves from one event to the next. There is no layering, little complexity, and an absence of the sublime.

Locas. I find the early Maggie and Hopey stories to be too soap-opera-y. I really like what Jaime is doing with Maggie now. The tensions between her punk background, her need to be a responsible adult, and her nostalgia make for captivating stories. But I just don’t find that complexity in the early stories.

Watchmen. I admire the care with which Moore and Gibbons put this book together. Yet at the same time, I find that care claustrophobic, and not in a good way. There is little mystery in the book. The characters are complex, but only to a degree. They all feel like they stand in for ideas; they never feel like real people. And I just find the ending laughable. It just went too far for my suspension of disbelief.

In order to balance this out, let me point out Sean T. Collins’s recent praise for Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, which a work many people like to malign. I agree with Collins that it is a book that actually makes superheros raw and fun again.

Posted in comics, graphic novels, reviews | 3 Comments

why do we follow that paradigm anyway?

I really like this post by Frank Santoro. Near the beginning, he discusses seeing Art Spielgelman’s Maus art at the MOMA and says this: “Looking at the whole exhibition, I remember being struck by the scale of it all. It was epic yet it was possible to contain it all on a small desk.” Like me and many of us I suspect whose only entry into how to create comics were books like How To Draw Comics the Marvel Way, Santoro started out drawing on large bristol, though I used 11×14″ since I couldn’t find any 11×17″. I hated drawing that big; I couldn’t see the whole page at once when I was working on it; the paper didn’t fir comfortably on a desk; the paper didn’t fit well onto a photocopier or a scanner; but the “pros” did it that way. Still, the hassles piled up and I finally asked myself: :”who am I trying to impress? Who’s going to care if I stop drawing so large?” Also, I had an inkling, as Santoro did, that there was something dishonest about drawing so large and then shrinking it all down to 6×9″. The art changed as a result. Furthermore, it was difficult to know how to hatch and how big to letter since everything got smaller and closer together. I finally gave it up, but I was left with a lot of 11×14″ paper and so cut it all in half and worked at 7×11″. Nowadays, I buy 9X12″ paper and I don’t buy Strathmore Bristol anymore. Besides the ease of finding paper this size and of being able to fit it in my scanner all at once, I also like being able to fit what I’m drawing onto my desk easily. 9×12″ is just a more manageable page size.

There are many paradigms that comics artists use that are throwbacks to another era. For instance, I use a dip pen, the nibs for which are getting more and more difficult to come by. Still, I probably won’t give it up any time soon, because I like using one and I’ve spent too long trying to master it to give it up now. Still, it’s worth it to figure out which paradigms actually help us to create better art and which are the byproducts of another time and culture. The older I get, the more I feel that whatever process you use that allows you to keep creating art is the right process. The process should never get in the way of your creation.

Posted in art process, comics, graphic novels, my comics | 2 Comments

A Drunken Dream and Other Stories by Moto Hagio

A Drunken Dream and Other Stories by Moto Hagio

If you don’t know, this book is a collection of short stories by Moto Hagio, one of the women who reinvented shojo (girls’) manga in the late 1960s. Her work, while famous and hugely influential in Japan, has barely been seen in the U.S. So this is an “important” book. And Fantagraphics has done a nice job with it and made a good choice to include Matt Thorn’s interview with Hagio.

But is this book any good?

In the end, yes, but it’s an odd collection. The stories are very different, though the same themes tend to come up repeatedly. Still, there are plenty of overly dramatic, one-dimensional stories here to confirm some people’s bias that shojo manga is silly. “Girl on a Porch With a Puppy” is incredibly simplistic in its message and the end is so shocking and unbelievable it reminded me of a bad Twilight Zone episode. And “Angel Mimic” is so mired in shojo manga stereotypes and full of forced dialogue that it feels more like a genre exercise than an actual story about human experience. Other stories are less cringe-inducing, though melodramatic: “Bianca,” “Autumn Journey,” and “The Willow Tree.” Yet while I may wish some of these stories hadn’t been included they do help to show the breadth of what Hagio can do. And they get you to open up to the “heart on its sleeve” attitude that these stories tend to have. As others have pointed out, these are not ironic stories with cynically distanced perspectives. These stories try to go right after the emotions they are exploring. And I think if you give yourself over to that and have experienced something of what the stories are about that these are really affecting works that talk about things few other comics stories do.

“Iguana Girl” and “Hanshin: Half-God” are the stories that most critics praise. Stylistically, these are the most experimental, especially “Iguana Girl.” In the story, a mother’s lack of love for her daughter manifests as her seeing her daughter as an iguana. So the daughter herself comes to believe that she is an iguana and is depicted as one throughout the story. What this tale presents is how our parents’ perception of us forms our self-identity even if that identity contradicts what others see. Comics are a particularly good medium for depicting this sort of thing (imagine the main character being an iguana in a film; it wouldn’t work) and it makes me wonder why I haven’t seen more stories like this. What makes this story so good is how far Hagio goes with this theme, how deeply she explores it. It isn’t simply a story that blames a mother for being heartless; it also explores the sibling dynamic that happens as a result and the young woman’s feelings about becoming a mother herself. And it feels true. For instance, when the mother dies, the woman doesn’t stop seeing herself as an iguana. As in life, our conflicts with our parents don’t end when the parents’ lives end. Our conflicts belong to us. Hagio has the maturity to look beyond easy blame.

Next to “Iguana Girl” and “Hanshin: Half-God,” my favorite stories in the book are “Marié, Ten Years Later” and “The Child Who Comes Home.” Both these stories border on the melodramatic, but the emotions in them seem real if overdramatized. “Marié, Ten Years Later” is similar to “Iguana Girl” in that it’s about self-perception and how we create narratives that both delude us and cover over pain. Yet this story is about a love triangle, not a family. While this story wallows a bit in time lost and opportunities untaken, it also offers some hope in the fact that life goes on. While the main character finally learns that Marié may have loved him and he never realized it, this realization offers the possibility that he can finally let go and move on. We mourn the loss of our youth, but perhaps that mourning is also the entry into another phase of life.

“The Child Who Comes Home” deals with the death of a child and its affect on a family. The main character is the surviving older brother. Hagio does a nice job of keeping this character silent, so when he finally releases the emotions he’s been feeling it has a real weight to it. But it also adds a level of complexity because it shows him to be more affected than he let on previously and ends up giving another dimension to the mother who at first seems a little one-dimensional.

Overall, what Hagio seems best at depicting is damaged characters, people who carry around some loss or hidden pain. What she shows is not just the pain itself, but how one lives with that pain, how one learns to be an adult, learns or doesn’t learn to move on. In other words, she explores how people come to deal with their scars, and sometimes realizing that the scars are not scars at all. Maybe I’m just getting older, but this is a theme I can really relate to. I’m not sure I would have said the same thing ten years ago. And so while these tories are often imperfect, they are often trying to depict something real. For that reason, and because they sometimes succeed, I think Hagio is, regardless of the hype, an important creator, not simply because she redefined a genre, but because she tries to make an art form speak about real human experience. And as I get older, I get hungrier for such art.

Noah Berlatsky did a series of interesting reviews on this book:
http://www.tcj.com/hoodedutilitarian/tag/drunken-slow-rolling-dream/.

Posted in comics, graphic novels, reviews | 1 Comment

a comics manifesto

I just checked out Bardín the Superrealist by Max from the library. I didn’t know Fantagraphics had published this. I saw some pieces of this comic when I was visiting Barcelona in 1998 and saw the 12 x 21 exhibition put on by the Institut de cultura in Barcelona and bought the first five issues of the anthology Nosotros Somos Los Muertos. This is still one of my favorite anthologies of all time and Max was one of the editors, along with Pere Joan. I may post more about the Bardín book later, but right now I wanted to put up the comics manifesto that Bardín writes on page 19.

We are sick and tired of the communication media and their self-proclaimed role as the guarantors of public freedoms, as the guardians of the public spirit, the popular sensibility and conscience. Under this cloak of words they are concealing a thoroughly sinister complex: the manipulation of public opinion, the numbing of popular conscience, the substitution of genuine commonality by the logic of economic forces!

And what can you say about common mortals? Frozen in their present, assuming their role without protest: Politicians and terrorists, bishops and rock ‘n’ rollers, pedophiliac internet predators, students, workers, and executives, writers and artists, all utterly predictable and bored, all contributing to the same chorus of tedium, incapable of creating anything genuine!

Where is the virtue?

Where is the love?

Wake up, O cartoonists, wake up from your Marvel-ous dreams! Create comics even though no one pays you for them, even though no one reads them! Cartooning is an act of virtue!

Let us undermine the syntax of sense, the logic of profit!

Drawing is an act of love, free, anonymous, and automatic!!

It’s free because no one can ever pay what it is truly worth. It’s anonymous because it’s aimed at the world in general and no one in particular. It’s automatic because, indeed, it’s done with no rhyme or reason whatsoever.

It’s an act of selflessness and purity!

“When the government is evil, the wise man practices virtue in his own home. When the government is good, the wise man does the same.”

We refuse to play your game! Even though no one needs them, even though no one buys them or reads them, even though no one ask us or thanks us… WE SHALL DRAW COMICS!!

Posted in comics, graphic novels | Leave a comment

units of composition

Comics and film often get compared. They are both visual narrative mediums, so it’s inevitable. Yet sometimes they get conflated. I’ve heard from a few places, such as an old interview with Frank Miller, that comics are just movies on paper. The comics artist, then, just plays an imagined movie in her or his head and transcribes that onto the page. But, as many others have pointed out, approaches that work in film don’t work in comics. And vice versa. Eisner is probably the first to lay out the differences. He spends the most time doing so on pages 70 through 73 of Graphic Storytelling & Visual Narrative. But he also touches on this in Comics & Sequential Art when he compares a comics panel to a film frame (40). In a comic, a reader can always see the future panels, whereas a film viewer can never see future frames. Eisner says that this is because “there are actually two ‘frames’… the page… and the panel itself” (41). To put this another way, a comics artist should not just consider what goes in each individual frame, which would be a film approach. Some artists do this of course, and in doing so they sacrifice readability as well as the larger aesthetic of the page. Just look at storyboards for a film and compare them to your favorite comic and the difference will become clear. But I want to add another category to Eisner’s concepts of page and panel. There is also the strip- the horizontal row of panels. So, it seems to me that artists tend to fall into categories based on their units of composition: panel, strip, or page.

From Drawn and Quarterly volume 3
From Drawn and Quarterly volume 3

The above Sunday page from Frank King’s Gasoline Alley is a classic example of the page as unit of composition approach. All the panels fit together to make the whole image of the house. We still read left-to-right, top-to-bottom, but we can also pull out of the action and see all the panels together as a whole. This is obviously something that isn’t possible in film.

Chris Ware was greatly inspired by King, as the above page from Jimmy Corrigan shows. Ware is probably the most famous current practitioner of the page as unit of composition approach. His pages are often geometrically balanced and he’s famous for his bravura pages of diagrammatic pages whose panels force the reader out of the normal reading paradigm.

The above image from Gipi’s The Innocents is an example of what I’m calling the strip as unit of composition approach. Gipi often uses one long panel per strip, but when he employs two they are structured to work together. In the example above, Andrea’s gaze and the tails of the word balloons point to the second panel, drawing the reader’s gaze from one panel to the next, and also making it clear that the second panel is what Andrea is seeing (the internal frame of the car window further heightening this). In other words, the two panels are not separate units, each conveying their own information. They are constructed to work together, to further the narrative not just by the information that each conveys, but what they convey together.

Of course, no one artist is limited to one approach, and no artist has to stick to one approach within a given work. Still, I think it’s interesting to look at the different rhythms and foci possible in comics art.

Posted in comics, comics theory, graphic novels | Leave a comment

APE 2010

I don’t have any photos or sketches or anything. Sorry.

So let me run through a few thoughts about APE 2010. Keep in mind that I stayed behind my table the whole show (except for one little peek around with my daughter) so my perspective is pretty skewed.

Money-wise, this APE was on par with other years. But overall, a lot fewer people actually came up to my table and looked at what was there. Sunday was especially bad. People just seemed to cruise down the halls without stopping. Maybe the large size was too much for people and they got overloaded. Maybe it was the rain. I don’t know, but Sunday was slow even though the amount of people didn’t seem less than Saturday.

The increased size was a little odd. The layout this year seemed funky to me. The big staircase that dominated the main floor really interrupted the flow of the hall. Also, the added amount of exhibitors didn’t mean an added amount of comics. If anything, there seemed to be fewer comics. There were a lot more plushies and art prints. A l*o*t more. I have nothing against these things per se  and there were some pretty cool creations, still the “press” side of Alternative Press Expo seems to have less importance these days. Maybe it was just where my table was, but my wife thought that some art teacher must tell his/her students to present their final projects at the APE. There did seem to be a lot more art students who seemed to be presenting prints of their end of term projects. Again, there was some nice stuff, but this is a change and made the amount of actual narrative art seem less.

This brings me to a distinction that I’ve been thinking about. This isn’t a new observation perhaps, but I finally have terms to describe it to help it make sense to me. There seems to be two competing aesthetics going on at the APE. One aesthetic is for art as art object. The focus is on the quality of the paper, the printing, the presentation, etc. The other aesthetic is art as narrative experience. Here the focus is on character, plot, mood, pacing, etc. Maybe this is simply the old art versus literature dichotomy that comes up in comics. Cons like the APE lend themselves to the first aesthetic, because time is short and surface detail is easier to take in quickly than narrative detail. So this preferencing of art as art object is nothing new, but it seemed pronounced this year. Or maybe I just noticed it more. One example is that Barron Storey, himself an art teacher, came up to my table and saw the cover of the new printing of Kit Kaleidoscope. He commented on how he liked what I had done with it and seemed to want to move on without checking out the interior of the book. My wife was behind the table at this moment and had no idea who Barron Storey was, and said “there’s more inside the book, too.” He gave her a rather perplexed look. Maybe it was her tone, or maybe it was that his focus was so much on the art as an object that he had forgotten the realm of narrative. Anyway, he moved onto the next table where the guy making buttons had taken a class from him. In his defense, Storey seems like a very supportive teacher. And perhaps he knows how difficult it is to take in narrative at a show like the APE and so doesn’t even try. Or maybe he’s part of the first aesthetic I named above.

Anyway, there’s one story I wanted to relate. The guy involved (John?) may be reading right now. Well, he came up to my table saying that he found my website (this one yer at right now) through Tom Spurgeon’s The Comics Reporter. Spurgeon had linked to my whining about the APE. This guy read that, came to my site, liked what he saw, and decided to buy to some of my stuff at the APE. As he put it, “your article about not making any money at the APE made me want to give you money at the APE.” This was one of the highlights of the show for me.

I got Lark’s new children’s book, Mr. Elephtanter, which is beautiful and made my daughter laugh. I completely forgot that Renee French was going to debut a new book at the show. I guess I’ll get that later. I didn’t get anything else except for one trade. As I said, I didn’t really make it around.

Back to finishing “Defrost”…

APE 2007APE 2008APE 2009

Posted in comics, graphic novels, my comics | 2 Comments

the Janus-headed dualist

I read Asterios Polyp a year ago and I was really disappointed.  Yes, I was amazed by what Mazzucchelli could do on the page, but I found the characters flat and the piling on of dualisms tiresome and unnatural. But I didn’t want to say anything. My expectations were high. I mean, I actually started reading comics because of Mazzucchelli. I saw his work in Daredevil when I was 12 and started reading then. And I loved Rubber Blanket, and his adaptation of City of Glass got me into Auster. So maybe my expectations were too high. Or maybe I just didn’t get the book. Well, I feel a little less alone now, because I discovered a roundtable at the Hooded Utilitarian that shares some of my views. I often don’t like the tones of the authors at the Hooded Utilitarian, but they at least take comics seriously and are willing to discuss them (if in too much of a “I’m a grad student trying to use every single term I learned in school” sort of way).

You know, I didn’t like David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest either, so maybe I’m just not hip anymore.

Posted in graphic novels, links, reviews | 6 Comments